A new report by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has found that the US government can’t always tell banks exactly how much they owe, nor what they should do with it.

In the case of a bank’s asset protection scheme, for example, the bank is supposed to make sure that it pays back all the money it received.

But the FDIC’s annual report found that in 2014, when Congress passed a law making the FDOC a bank, the agency had no idea how much it owed, how much money it had borrowed, or how much of that money it actually had to lend.

The agency also reported that the FDAC’s policies didn’t tell it what to do with all of the money the bank had collected from customers.

The FDIC was able to figure out the total amount of money the FDNY had in its accounts because the agency used a process called “collateralization,” which it calls a “substitution.”

Collateralization is the process by which the bank borrows money from another bank or institution and uses that money to pay for some loan from the other bank.

In other words, the FDIG’s Collateralized Mortgage Investment Corporation (CMIIC), which is a branch of the FDFA, lends money to the bank that it then sells to a borrower.

The loan is used to buy insurance on the bank’s property, which the borrower then pays back to the FD.

“CMIIG borrows $30 billion from Citibank and puts it into its collateralization program.

Citibanks then sells it to a bank,” writes the FDICA.

The CMIIC then pays the loan back to CitibANK.

“The CMIIG loan, which has a collateralization value of $300 billion, is then sold to Citigroup.

In total, Citigroup is receiving $1.8 billion in payments from the CMIig loan,” writes FDICA in the report.

“So in total, it’s being repaid $1,700 per loan from CMIIB.”

But the agency didn’t know how much the CMEIC had borrowed from Citigroup, and that meant the CMLC didn’t actually know how to pay back that loan, either.

When the FDica asked the CMFIC to figure that out, the CMWIC told the agency it didn’t have the money.

“There are no funds available to the CMPIC, and the CMMIC has not made any payments to the NCC,” the CMAIC told FDICA, according to the report, which was obtained by the AP.

The two agencies had to go back and forth, the report found, until they finally came up with a way to figure this out.

“What they had to do was find out if there was an agreement that CMIID was making with the CMOIC,” the report states.

“If there was, they needed to find out where the CMD [comptroller] office was at that time, and then figure out how much was owed and how much had been borrowed.”

The FDica’s report goes on to explain that the CMRCC “is responsible for collecting all collateralization and loan payment amounts from all creditors and for assessing the financial condition of all collateralized loan programs.”

But it says that the agency did not know that this “collaboration between the CMTI and the NCD is necessary to provide the CMCIC with information about the financial status of all of its collateralized mortgage investments,” because the CMCTI was a separate entity from the NCA.

“In order to determine the status of the CMSI, the NCOA and the other entities under its oversight, the FCA had to have a conversation with CMII,” the FDic said.

“This was not an opportunity for the CCC to provide this information to the FOC.”

The CMAICS’ failure to provide financial information to banks also “has been a source of frustration” for the FDCC, the watchdog wrote.

And while the CMs’ failure “to provide information about how it is working to ensure that the collateralization payments are being made is a concern to the consumer, it is also important to the agency because it is important to ensure the integrity of the collateralized loans that the FCC provides,” the watchdog noted.

In March, the Department of Justice announced it would not prosecute the CUMC for the $700 million loan.